by Arik/E Seidenglanz





In the deepest recesses of man's soul, amid the multiplicity of characters, each an "I" intertwined with the rest,


the call of the bird breaks through, piercing the screen of futile words with the raw power of a bygone world.


Waves lap against the shore, carrying with them the weight of memory and the promise of a new dawn.


Nostalgia echoes like the myth of a lost Eden, a sentiment Mircea Eliade touched upon:


Modern man's life brims with half-forgotten myths and obsolete symbols.


A phone rings and a ring camera blares out its tiny speakers, "You are being recorded." Over the Bang & Olufsen Beocom 1987 telephone with its crystal-clear audio and a traditional landline, his French accent thick, smooth, and calming; he’s laughing as he now has control over my home security system, almost taunting me. This is my last memory of Jean-Luc and a deeply introspective moment in my life. Having memorised the poem "I play, you play, we play..." while looking in the mirror of other people, quickly and slowly seeing the world and oneself. This is how I remember him, a teacher, through our collaborative moment captured by a ring doorbell camera. Jean-Luc Godard’s cinema is a testament to this intertwining of the past and the present,


a collage of voices and images that lay bare the complexity of a conscience steeped in literary echoes, societal norms, and aesthetic biases.


Love's mystery, the solitude of a man—these themes are overshadowed by a torrent of mundane concerns.


The disruptions and contrasts he employs reveal the intricate dance between words and their deeper meanings,


each phrase a fragment of a larger, elusive truth.


Nostalgia dances through "all those images," a draft for an alternate reality where life's earnestness intertwines with ephemeral dreams, melancholy, and imagination.


Can modern man, severed from nature's energies and seeing it only as pleasant scenery,


resist the current and reconnect with the universe? This existential question permeates the film’s fabric, woven into its very essence.


Beyond words, music returns like a memory

—fragmented yet eternal—


woven into the fabric of sound.


The bandoneon's fluid motion accompanies the film's opening phrases, blending with bird calls and distant storms,


imbuing the spoken words with intensity.


Music stops abruptly, rises with a cry, harmonises with internal dialogue,


and dances with spoken phrases, becoming a tapestry of sound and emotion.


The dialogue between him and her shifts from superficial to profound, marked by the tremors of a cello and the frenzied tones of danger,


softening with Italian words of comfort.


Music reveals what neutral words conceal, punctuating the agitation between them.


As time unfolds, their words become magic formulas, casting shadows on the present and future.


Love searches for itself beyond time and security, always striving to be more than just love.


Memory and history converge, outlined against the seasons,


defending the dead against the living, or vice versa.


Words ripple through time, echoing the past and foreshadowing the future.


The presence of love, the regret of high costs for uncertain gains,


all expressed in fragmented yet poignant dialogue.


Godard weaves continuity between the world's memory and man's,


creating a dance of images and sounds, revealing the fragility and transient beauty of life.


His cinema captures the interplay of words and silence, of shadows and light, inviting us to lose ourselves in the profound mystery of existence.


In the chaos of polyphonic voices, everyday sounds, and personal reflections,


the boundary between interior and exterior dissolves.


Godard's film invites us to experience time and space as interwoven moments,


a continuous dance of memory and anticipation, where love and solitude coexist,

and every word and sound is a thread in the intricate tapestry of life.


This film, a mosaic of existential reflections and fragmented dialogues,


underscores the ephemeral nature of existence.


The music, at times melancholic and at others frenzied, mirrors the emotional landscape of the characters.


The soundtrack becomes a living entity, pulsating with the rhythm of their lives, their loves, and their losses.


Godard’s use of silence is not a void but a space teeming with potential,


where the absence of sound becomes a powerful statement.


It is in these moments of silence that the true essence of the characters is revealed, their vulnerabilities laid bare.


The silence speaks volumes, often more profound than the spoken word,


creating a resonance that lingers long after the film ends.


The visual and auditory elements of the film are in constant dialogue, each enhancing the other,


creating a symphony of sights and sounds.


The fragmented narrative, the abrupt cuts, and the overlapping dialogues all serve to disorient the viewer,


forcing them to engage more deeply with the film.


It is a cinematic experience that demands attention, contemplation, and ultimately, a surrender to its chaotic beauty.


In the end, Godard's films reflect on the human condition, a meditation on love, memory, and the passage of time.


It is a reminder of the transient nature of existence and the enduring power of art to capture the fleeting moments of life.


Through its innovative use of sound and image, the film transcends the boundaries of traditional cinema,


offering a glimpse into a world where the past and present, reality and imagination, converge in a continuous dance.


This is the essence of Godard's genius: his ability to create a film that is at once deeply personal and universally resonant,


a work of art that speaks to the soul, and a reminder of the enduring power of cinema to reflect and transform the human experience.


The dual nature of text and intention further complicates this analysis. Godard’s films thrive on the uncertainty of intent, reflecting the unconscious mind of the creator. Each scene, every line, becomes a transaction, a dual narcissism where author and audience project and interpret. This linguistic crisis becomes the decisive moment, the point of critical connection that determines whether the narrative thrives or collapses, much like the turning point in an illness.



A/E Seidenglanz




© 2024 by Arik/E Seidenglanz

. All rights reserved.